Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3191442.3191458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonuniform Weighted Loss Function for Imbalanced Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While standard techniques like data augmentation and weighted loss function [ 60 ] can sometimes be used to correct the imbalanced data distributions, they are not applicable in all situations. In our experiments, data augmentation and weighted loss function do not enrich our model, which is not unexpected.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While standard techniques like data augmentation and weighted loss function [ 60 ] can sometimes be used to correct the imbalanced data distributions, they are not applicable in all situations. In our experiments, data augmentation and weighted loss function do not enrich our model, which is not unexpected.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible solutions for handling the long-tailed distribution include modification of the data distribution 1 and adjustment of reasonable costs to reweight class errors. 2,3 However, the existing data-level approaches are prone to overfitting, whereas existing cost-sensitive learning methods require a careful choice of weights. As discussed by Fort et al, 4 these approaches have not performed well in rare conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall structure of the network is complex, requires high hardware resources, and the detection speed is slow. In order to better deploy the object detection algorithm on UAV-related embedded equipment, Zhang et al proposed the Slim YOLOv3 [39] algorithm, which was tested on the VisDrone 2018 [10] object detection test set, and the detection accuracy of the algorithm was comparable to that of YOLOv3 [40] [23], the number of parameters of the network was reduced by 92%, and the detection speed was increased by two times. In 2021, Piciarelli et al proposed an algorithm for real-time tracking and detection of multi-scale targets [2], and experimental results show that its performance reaches the most advanced algorithm performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%