2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on capacity models for network design

Abstract: In network design problems capacity constraints are modeled in three different ways depending on the application and the underlying technology for installing capacity: directed, bidirected, and undirected. In the literature, polyhedral investigations for strengthening mixed-integer formulations are done separately for each model. In this paper, we examine the relationship between these models to provide a unifying approach and show that one can indeed translate valid inequalities from one to the others. In par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, for any γ > 0, 1 /2γ r∈R k∈K x k,r i,j 2 is a ridge regularization term that improves Problem (1)'s practical tractability (c.f. Bertsimas et al 2021), by augmenting the hard constraint k∈K x k,r i,j ≤ u i,j on each edge's capacity with a soft penalty in the objective (see also Atamtürk and Günlük (2018) for a discussion of capacity constraints in network design problems). Correspondingly, Problem (1) is an upper approximation of the optimal objective value without regularization.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, for any γ > 0, 1 /2γ r∈R k∈K x k,r i,j 2 is a ridge regularization term that improves Problem (1)'s practical tractability (c.f. Bertsimas et al 2021), by augmenting the hard constraint k∈K x k,r i,j ≤ u i,j on each edge's capacity with a soft penalty in the objective (see also Atamtürk and Günlük (2018) for a discussion of capacity constraints in network design problems). Correspondingly, Problem (1) is an upper approximation of the optimal objective value without regularization.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%