2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-020-10118-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on dual prehomomorphisms from a group into the Margolis–Meakin expansion of a group

Abstract: We give a category-free order theoretic variant of a key result in Auinger and Szendrei (J Pure Appl Algebra 204(3):493–506, 2006) and illustrate how it might be used to compute whether a finite X-generated group H admits a canonical dual prehomomorphism into the Margolis–Meakin expansion M(G) of a finite X-generated group G. We show that for G the Klein four-group a suitable H must be of exponent 6 at least and recapture a result of Szakács.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the latter paper went beyond its immediate task as in the following years interesting and deep connections with the profinite topology of the free group [21] and finite model theory [12] have been revealed and studied [1,2]. Yet the second stated problem which was called by the authors a "stronger form of the pointlike conjecture for inverse monoids" has not been solved in Ash's paper and has since then attracted considerable attention [14,25,26,5,24,23,8]. It asked: Problem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the latter paper went beyond its immediate task as in the following years interesting and deep connections with the profinite topology of the free group [21] and finite model theory [12] have been revealed and studied [1,2]. Yet the second stated problem which was called by the authors a "stronger form of the pointlike conjecture for inverse monoids" has not been solved in Ash's paper and has since then attracted considerable attention [14,25,26,5,24,23,8]. It asked: Problem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%