2005
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on least squares methods

Abstract: SUMMARYWe examine the relationship of preconditioned L 2 residual, Sobolev gradient and H −1 least squares methods. Of particular interest are: (1) a demonstration that the Sobolev gradient approach is simply a form of preconditioning for the standard L 2 scheme, and (2) that the Sobolev preconditioner is related to the additional solve step in the H −1 formulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like every numerical technique, this least-squares method has its peculiar strengths and weaknesses [16]. Advantages of least squares include generality and convenience: a symmetric form even for non-self adjoint PDEs, less sensitivity to changes in PDE type (e.g.…”
Section: A Least-squares Mixed Methods Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like every numerical technique, this least-squares method has its peculiar strengths and weaknesses [16]. Advantages of least squares include generality and convenience: a symmetric form even for non-self adjoint PDEs, less sensitivity to changes in PDE type (e.g.…”
Section: A Least-squares Mixed Methods Examplementioning
confidence: 99%