2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2694-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on linearized reformulations for a class of bilevel linear integer problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These MIP models typically exploit either subtour‐elimination or flow‐based ideas. On the other hand, single‐level reformulations of bilevel problems mostly focus on using the optimality conditions (e.g., strong duality of LPs) to replace the lower‐level problem with additional linear or nonlinear constraints . The models proposed in this section represent a combination of these ideas in the context of the BST problem.…”
Section: The Bst(xs) Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These MIP models typically exploit either subtour‐elimination or flow‐based ideas. On the other hand, single‐level reformulations of bilevel problems mostly focus on using the optimality conditions (e.g., strong duality of LPs) to replace the lower‐level problem with additional linear or nonlinear constraints . The models proposed in this section represent a combination of these ideas in the context of the BST problem.…”
Section: The Bst(xs) Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These terms can only be linearized if all linking variables are integer. Recently, in [55], a numerical study is provided that compares the KKT approach with the strong-duality approach for linear bilevel problems with integer linking variables and continuous lower-level problems. The authors conclude that the strong-duality reformulation works significantly better than the KKT reformulation for problems with large lower-level problems.…”
Section: A Convex Single-level Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The products of binary and continuous variables can then be linearized by several techniques. According to the numerical study in [55], the following approach works best in a bilevel context. We express the integer variables x j with the help ofr j = log 2 (x + j ) + 1 many auxiliary binary variables s jr :…”
Section: Convexification Of the Strong-duality Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of this approach is the bilinear term λ C x of primal upperlevel and dual lower-level variables. When considering only integer linking variables, as, e.g., in [25], linearizations can be applied yielding mixed-integer linear reformulations. Here, however, we study purely continuous bilevel problems.…”
Section: A New Valid Primal-dual Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%