2015
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2015-0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on nilpotent representations

Abstract: Abstract. Let Γ be a finitely generated nilpotent group and let G be a complex reductive algebraic group. The representation variety Hom(Γ, G) and the character variety Hom(Γ, G) G each carry a natural topology, and we describe the topology of their connected components in terms of representations factoring through quotients of Γ by elements of its lower central series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that the third vertical map is also a homotopy equivalence. The first vertical map and the second vertical maps are G-equivariant by results of Bergeron and Silberman [7]. Therefore, obtain a commutative diagram S n,2 (G)/G Hom(Z n , G) 1 /G Hom(Z n , G) 1 /G = T n /W S n,q (G)/G Hom(F n /Γ q n , G) 1 /G Hom(F n /Γ q n , G) 1 /G.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows that the third vertical map is also a homotopy equivalence. The first vertical map and the second vertical maps are G-equivariant by results of Bergeron and Silberman [7]. Therefore, obtain a commutative diagram S n,2 (G)/G Hom(Z n , G) 1 /G Hom(Z n , G) 1 /G = T n /W S n,q (G)/G Hom(F n /Γ q n , G) 1 /G Hom(F n /Γ q n , G) 1 /G.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Bergeron and Silberman [7] show that if Γ is a finitely generated nilpotent group, then Rep(Γ, G) 1 has the same homology as Rep(Γ/Γ q , G) 1 with coefficients in a field with characteristic not dividing |W |. Therefore, Theorem 1.4 applies also to all such Γ, in particular to free nilpotent groups F n /Γ q .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The corresponding result for Rep(Z n , G) was established by Florentino-Lawton [22] (note that when G is reductive, Rep(Z n , G) should be interpreted as a GIT quotient), and generalizations to nilpotent groups discrete groups were obtained by Bergeron [8]. Moreover, Bergeron and Silberman showed in [9] that when G is compact and Γ is nilpotent, the connected component of the identity in Hom(Γ, G) contains only abelian representations, and hence is the same as Hom(H 1 (Γ), G) 1 . These results allow us to extend most of the stability statements in the paper (Section 11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…By Lemmas 7.6 and 7.7 together with Theorems 4.11 and 4.20, it suffices to show that the FI#-modules H k (P(T )) W and H k (G/T × P(T )) W are generated in stage k. Proposition 5.3 tells us that H k (P(T )) is finitely generated in stage k, and the same holds for H k (P(T )) W by Lemma 7.8. Next, we have a decomposition of FI#-modules (9) H…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for a fixed m > 2 one could ask for stability conditions on q → B(q, SU (m)). For the reduced version, B(q, SU (m)) 1 → B(q + 1, SU(m)) 1 is a homeomorphism for every q ≥ 2 by a result of M. Bergeron and L. Silberman [10]. But this is no longer the case for the full non-(−) 1 version.…”
Section: Homology Of B(q Su (2))mentioning
confidence: 99%