2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on nonparametric estimation of copula-based multivariate extensions of Spearman’s rho

Abstract: Schmid and Schmidt (2007) proposed copula-based nonparametric estimators for some multivariate extensions of Spearman's rho. In this paper, we show that two of those estimators are inappropriate since they can take values out of the parameter space and we discuss alternative proposals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, these authors propose estimating nonparametrically the coefficients ρd- and ρd+ by replacing the copula C in (3) and (4), respectively, with the empirical copula in (10). However, Pérez and Prieto‐Alaiz (2016b) show that the resultant statistics are not proper estimators of their population counterparts, since they can take values out of the parameter space. The modifications proposed by Blumentritt and Schmid (2014) and Bedo and Ong (2014) have still some drawbacks, as they fail to achieve the maximum value 1 for maximal dependence and take a narrower range of values than they should.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, these authors propose estimating nonparametrically the coefficients ρd- and ρd+ by replacing the copula C in (3) and (4), respectively, with the empirical copula in (10). However, Pérez and Prieto‐Alaiz (2016b) show that the resultant statistics are not proper estimators of their population counterparts, since they can take values out of the parameter space. The modifications proposed by Blumentritt and Schmid (2014) and Bedo and Ong (2014) have still some drawbacks, as they fail to achieve the maximum value 1 for maximal dependence and take a narrower range of values than they should.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modifications proposed by Blumentritt and Schmid (2014) and Bedo and Ong (2014) have still some drawbacks, as they fail to achieve the maximum value 1 for maximal dependence and take a narrower range of values than they should. To overcome these problems, Pérez and Prieto‐Alaiz (2016b) propose alternative feasible nonparametric estimators of ρd- and ρd+, based on the results in Joe (1990), which are given by the following expressions, respectively: trueρ^d-=1nfalse∑j=1nfalse∏i=1dtrueU¯~italicij-)(n+12nd1nfalse∑j=1n)(jnd-)(n+12nd, trueρ^d+=1nfalse∑j=1nfalse∏i=1dtrueU~italicij-)(n+12nd1nfalse∑j=1n)(jnd-)(n+12nd,where trueU¯~italicij=R¯italicij/n and R…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the lower bound was introduced by [18], and was shown to be the best possible lower bound by Úbeda-Flores [33,Theorem 5.1]. Note that the lower bound in (19) converges to zero as d tends to infinity. The minimal value of τ is achieved when [0,1] d C d (u) dC d (u) is equal to zero which happens for example for a random vector containing a random variable X and also −X.…”
Section: Multivariate Kendall's Taumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, one can calculate The estimator of that could then be considered is of the form However, this quantity does not provide the value 1 for a sample from a comonotonicity copula. See the related discussion in [ 25 ]. This problem increases, while gets smaller.…”
Section: Estimation Of Tail Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%