2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)80991-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Parallel Splicing on Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the symbol 8 to denote the horizontal concatenation, and it is defined as follows: Note that the row concatenation for two images is defined only when the number of columns of those two images are the same, and the column concatenation for two images is defined only when the number of rows of those two images are the same, N ow we recall the row and column concatenations of two picture languages,and the H -array splicing system discussed in [5], [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use the symbol 8 to denote the horizontal concatenation, and it is defined as follows: Note that the row concatenation for two images is defined only when the number of columns of those two images are the same, and the column concatenation for two images is defined only when the number of rows of those two images are the same, N ow we recall the row and column concatenations of two picture languages,and the H -array splicing system discussed in [5], [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He introduced I-splicing, 2-splicing, iterative splicing and double splicing [1], and he showed that double splicing is more powerful than normal splicing on strings. The splicing operation defined for strings has been extended to pictures, and several properties of the family of picture languages generated by the splicing system have been studied by various researchers [2], [5], [7]- [9]. Parallel splicing on images has been introduced in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations