2000
DOI: 10.1006/jeth.2000.2654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Price and Quantity Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies

Abstract: In this note we show that the results developed in Singh and Vives (1984) are sensitive to the duopoly assumption (Rand 15,[546][547][548][549][550][551][552][553][554]. If there are more than two firms, prices may be higher under price competition than under quantity competition. This will be the case if quality differences are large and goods are complements. If goods are substitutes, high-quality firms may earn higher profits under price competition than under quantity competition. Hence, it is not evident … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
267
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
267
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To check the robustness of my results with respect to other specifications of demand, I analyse in the appendix an alternative extension of the quadratic utility model, following Häckner (2000). The results from this alternative demand system are very similar to those presented in the main body of the paper: all the propositions proved below are robust to the choice of demand specification.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To check the robustness of my results with respect to other specifications of demand, I analyse in the appendix an alternative extension of the quadratic utility model, following Häckner (2000). The results from this alternative demand system are very similar to those presented in the main body of the paper: all the propositions proved below are robust to the choice of demand specification.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…I analyse here an alternative version of the quality-augmented quadratic utility model, following Häckner (2000). The structure of the game is the same as before.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zanchettin (2006) shows that this result extends to duopolies with exogenous cost differences while for symmetric cost structures the result also extends to an oligopoly (Vives 1985). Häckner (2000) reveals however that in an oligopoly of complementary goods with exogenous quality differences the low-quality firms may charge higher prices under Bertrand competition than under Cournot competition. The switch from Cournot competition to Bertrand competition induces the high-quality firms to charge a lower price.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A substantial body of the literature (see e.g., For instance, Cheng (1985) and Vives (1985) generalized these results respectively by means of a geographic approach and by considering the n-…rm oligopoly case with general demand functions. Dastidar (1997) and Häckner (2000), instead, pointed out the sensitivity of the results in Singh and Vives to the sharing rules governing oligopoly and to the type of product di¤erentiation. 1 We demonstrate that the standard conclusions about price and quantity competition can be altered in the context of a vertically related market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%