2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on rumination behavior of dairy cows under intensive grazing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…day in the current study were similar to that reported by Prendiville et al (2010) for lactating Jersey cows at 422, but on average were 163 boli less than that reported by Gregorini et al (2013) for Jersey cows. Rook (2000) outlined how cow anatomy can influence behaviour, with body and muzzle size creating physical limitations, which was also observed in bolus movement during rumination by Prendiville et al (2010).…”
Section: Ruminating Behavioursupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…day in the current study were similar to that reported by Prendiville et al (2010) for lactating Jersey cows at 422, but on average were 163 boli less than that reported by Gregorini et al (2013) for Jersey cows. Rook (2000) outlined how cow anatomy can influence behaviour, with body and muzzle size creating physical limitations, which was also observed in bolus movement during rumination by Prendiville et al (2010).…”
Section: Ruminating Behavioursupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the current study, neither cow genotype nor genetic merit exhibited differences in absolute ruminating behaviour. The lack of association between ruminating time and genetic merit or cow genotype is in line with the findings of Gregorini et al (2013) on lactating dairy cows of diverse genetic merit and Kropp et al (1973) on Hereford and Hereford x Holstein heifers. Values for ruminating time in the current study fall within the range outlined in a review by Kilgour (2012) of 22 studies on grazing beef and dairy (non-milking) cattle encompassing a diversity of production systems, breeds, ages and animal types (heifers, steers, bulls, cows) of 4.7 h to 10.2 h. The values for ruminating time extrapolated in the current study equated to the same proportion of the day (75% of time spent grazing) spent ruminating as outlined by Fraser and Broom (1997).…”
Section: Ruminating Behavioursupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The HR cows, on average had higher parity, which is consistent with the observation of greater rumination in older, often more dominant animals, than younger subordinate counterparts (Gregorini et al, 2013). The HR cows also had greater milk production, concentrate intake, and estimated intake, in total.…”
Section: Rumination Patternssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These may include differences in digestive capacity (Dado and Allen, 1994) or retention of digesta in the rumen and its rate of passage (Ørskov et al, 1988). The influence of these factors on the rumination of dairy cows at pasture was previously suggested in the study of Gregorini et al (2013), but to our knowledge a paucity of studies have investigated the effect of digestive and physiological drivers on rumination. It is likely that a complex arrangement of both interacting abiotic factors (i.e., distance to pasture or water) and biotic factors (i.e., pasture quality and quantity), which can affect both physiological and behavioral mechanisms, regulate the rumination time of cows at pasture; however, this hypothesis requires further development and investigation.…”
Section: Rumination Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation