1992
DOI: 10.1177/0306312792022001002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Socio-Technical Graphs

Abstract: This paper reports on an attempt to create a new research tool, to follow the dynamics of science and technology. `Socio-Technical Analysis' develops new quantitative indicators and graphic representations with which to map the development of a scientific controversy, or a technical innovation. The aim of the paper is to describe this approach, to stimulate reflexion and criticism, and to launch what can only be a collective project.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity refers to the inclusion of both human and nonhuman actants, as discussed above. Stabilized networks occur when patterns of actants appear together repeatedly (Latour et al 1992). If the pattern is sufficiently stable, it may become a "black box" (Latour 1987).…”
Section: Structuration Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity refers to the inclusion of both human and nonhuman actants, as discussed above. Stabilized networks occur when patterns of actants appear together repeatedly (Latour et al 1992). If the pattern is sufficiently stable, it may become a "black box" (Latour 1987).…”
Section: Structuration Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our ongoing investigation, we are now individually and collectively exploring how other representations might productively be layered with communicative event diagrams and genre ecology models. Socio-technical graphs [3] as described by Latour et al. appear, for example, to offer a meaningful contribution in this effort.…”
Section: Discussion Of Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, none of those representations grasps PD processes and the richness, as well as the messiness, grassroots participation brings. There is evidence that certain methods of mapping promote public involvement in decision-making (Latour et al, 1992;Sieber, 2006). If PD were to be incorporated convincingly in urban planning, it would greatly benefit from these mapping methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%