2016
DOI: 10.1002/sim.7175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on statistical repeatability and study design for high-throughput assays

Abstract: Characterizing the technical precision of measurements is a necessary stage in the planning of experiments and in the formal sample size calculation for optimal design. Instruments that measure multiple analytes simultaneously, such as in high‐throughput assays arising in biomedical research, pose particular challenges from a statistical perspective. The current most popular method for assessing precision of high‐throughput assays is by scatterplotting data from technical replicates. Here, we question the stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SD of the fall is assumed to be 12.5 mmHg and the cost of enrolling a subject is estimated to be 15 times the cost of making an additional measurement on an enrolled subject. The ICC for repeat systolic measurements is assumed to be 0.67 [ 3 ]. The use of multiple measures at baseline and 12 m is being considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SD of the fall is assumed to be 12.5 mmHg and the cost of enrolling a subject is estimated to be 15 times the cost of making an additional measurement on an enrolled subject. The ICC for repeat systolic measurements is assumed to be 0.67 [ 3 ]. The use of multiple measures at baseline and 12 m is being considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample size calculation based on the above Glynn and Rosner example suggests that a standardized difference of 0.4 in a binary predictive factor could be detected with 80% power using 197 single eyes; this decreases to a standardized difference of 0.25 if both eyes ( N = 394) are studied. Nicholson and Holmes [ 3 ] noted that a popular but improper method for assessing high-throughput assays’ precision is by scatter-plotting data. This consists of equally dividing a sample and assaying the two halves separately, then plotting and correlating all analytes’ results in the first half versus the second half.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related fields of functional genomics, such as transcriptomics, have seen considerable interest in controlling for different experimental sources of variation, broadly labeled as batch effects [28,[62][63][64][65][66][67]. These studies have shown that differences between batches first need to be corrected to avoid erroneous conclusions [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the detectable δ 13 C and δ 15 N separation between captive and wild groups or to increase effect size differences, the variance of each hierarchal level of sampling (indi-vidual > scute > sample) needed to be minimised without oversampling (Nicholson and Holmes 2017). A pilot analysis was performed to provide estimates of the variances of each hierarchal level of sampling.…”
Section: Sampling Size and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%