2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the accuracy of the upgraded Cheng and Todreas correlation for predicting pressure drop in hexagonal bare rod bundles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the reliability of the model and mesh developed, the pressure gradients in the tube bundle were compared with the analytical correlation [20] for all the cases simulated. The accuracy of the Upgraded Cheng and Todreas (UCT) pressure drop correlation for bare rod bundles is about ±10% for all the flow regimes [21], as reported in Table 6 the discrepancy of the CFD results is always lower than 7% for all the cases confirming the reliability of the CFD results. To assess the reliability of the model and mesh developed, the pressure gradients in the tube bundle were compared with the analytical correlation [20] for all the cases simulated.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…To assess the reliability of the model and mesh developed, the pressure gradients in the tube bundle were compared with the analytical correlation [20] for all the cases simulated. The accuracy of the Upgraded Cheng and Todreas (UCT) pressure drop correlation for bare rod bundles is about ±10% for all the flow regimes [21], as reported in Table 6 the discrepancy of the CFD results is always lower than 7% for all the cases confirming the reliability of the CFD results. To assess the reliability of the model and mesh developed, the pressure gradients in the tube bundle were compared with the analytical correlation [20] for all the cases simulated.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%