2014
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the asymmetric part of an outranking relation

Abstract: This note discusses the properties of the asymmetric part of an outranking relationà la ELECTRE. Such relations have been used in the pseudodisjunctive version of ELECTRE TRI-B. We show that they have properties that are somewhat different from the ones of outranking relations. Indeed, contrary to outranking relations, they allow to have at the same time veto and bonus effects. We suggest that this explains the difficulty in analyzing the properties of the pseudo-disjunctive version of ELECTRE TRI-B and the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above analysis and review of prior research suggest that a combination of SMAA and outranking relation models can effectively solve stochastic MCDM problems with imprecise, partial, missing, or uncertain information. As one of the classical methods based on outranking relation models, the family of ELECTRE methods have been extensively studied and widely applied in various field (Buchanan and Vanderpooten, 2007;Covas et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014a;Bouyssou and Pirlot, 2015;Govindan and Jepsen, 2016;Peng et al, 2016). ELECTRE III is the most popular method of this kind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above analysis and review of prior research suggest that a combination of SMAA and outranking relation models can effectively solve stochastic MCDM problems with imprecise, partial, missing, or uncertain information. As one of the classical methods based on outranking relation models, the family of ELECTRE methods have been extensively studied and widely applied in various field (Buchanan and Vanderpooten, 2007;Covas et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014a;Bouyssou and Pirlot, 2015;Govindan and Jepsen, 2016;Peng et al, 2016). ELECTRE III is the most popular method of this kind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%