“… → (Λ )2 , → Λ Λ and → Λ are continuous from 2 into 2 . Hence, using (5.100) on the one hand and , (5.97)-(5.98) on the other hand one can easily obtain (5.99), which conclude the proof of Lemma 3.At this stage, we have obtained by Lebesgue's convergence theorem once again (5.94) for = and ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) = (− ) , we infer from (5.101) thatlim sup →+∞ ̃ ( ) ≤ [lim sup →+∞ ̃ ( (− ) ) + | ̃ ( (− ) )|] −2 + ̃ ( ).Thanks (− ) to and (− ) belong to (⊂ 2 ), there exists = ( , , , , , ) such thatlim sup →+∞ ̃ ( ) ≤ −̃ ( ).…”