2020
DOI: 10.1002/mma.6709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the finite fractal dimension of the global attractors for dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger‐type equations

Abstract: In this article, we present, throughout two basic models of damped nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS)-type equations, a new idea to bound from above the fractal dimension of the global attractors for NLS-type equations. This could answer the following open issue: consider, for instance, the classical one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation u t + iu xx + i|u| 2 u + u = , ∈ L 2 (R). "How can we bound the fractal dimension of the associate global attractor without the need to assume that the external forcin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, thanks to the Young inequality, we obtain from (74) thatd dt ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 + ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 + ||θ R Y || 2 + ||Y || 2 L 2 .This leads, thanks to Gronwall's Lemma and in accordance with Lemma 5.6, to ||(Z(t), Y (t)||2 …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, thanks to the Young inequality, we obtain from (74) thatd dt ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 + ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 ||θ R Z|| 2 L 2 + ||θ R Y || 2 + ||Y || 2 L 2 .This leads, thanks to Gronwall's Lemma and in accordance with Lemma 5.6, to ||(Z(t), Y (t)||2 …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…proof of Lemma 5.4. To begin with, for arbitrary R > 0 we write R |ϑ| |u| 2 dx = [−R,R]∩{|ϑ|≤R} |ϑ| |u| 2 dx + [−R,R]∩{|ϑ|>R} |ϑ| |u| 2 dx + {|x|>R} |ϑ| |u| 2 dxwe obtain by applying the Hölder inequality thatR |ϑ| |u| 2 dx ≤ R ||u|| 2 L 2 ([−R,R]) + ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|ϑ|>R}) + ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|x|>R}) ||u|| 2 L 4 (R)by means of which and the continuous embedding ofH α 2 in L 4 (Lemma 2.3) we deduce that R |ϑ| |u| 2 dx ≤ R ||u|| 2 L 2 ([−R,R]) + C ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|ϑ|>R}) + ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|x|>R})||u|| Knowing that ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|ϑ|>R}) + ||ϑ|| L 2 ({|x|>R}) −→ 0 as R −→ +∞, we deduce that for every > 0 there exists R = R(ϑ, ) > 0 satisfying R |ϑ| |u| 2 dx ≤ ||u||2…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… → (Λ )2 ,  → Λ Λ and  → Λ are continuous from 2 into 2 . Hence, using (5.100) on the one hand and , (5.97)-(5.98) on the other hand one can easily obtain (5.99), which conclude the proof of Lemma 3.At this stage, we have obtained by Lebesgue's convergence theorem once again (5.94) for = and ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) = (− ) , we infer from (5.101) thatlim sup →+∞ ̃ ( ) ≤ [lim sup →+∞ ̃ ( (− ) ) + | ̃ ( (− ) )|] −2 + ̃ ( ).Thanks (− ) to and (− ) belong to  (⊂ 2 ), there exists = ( , , , , , ) such thatlim sup →+∞ ̃ ( ) ≤ −̃ ( ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%