The existence of a wide disparity in labor returns between the farm and nonfarm sectors and considerable variations in agricultural wage rates among regions suggest that there may be real differences in factors affecting the supply of and demand for labor among sectors and regions. A knowledge of these supply and demand structural relationships could be of use to policy makers in developing measures that will help to minimize some of these income and wage discrepancies. In this study, regional supply relations for hired agricultural labor are developed and estimated. Two hypotheses are tested: (a) that members of the hired farm labor force respond to economic stimuli with a distributed lag, and (b) that they participate in a national rather than a regional labor market. The results support both hypotheses. One of the policy implications is that programs which increase nonfarm wages are more effective in the long run in raising farm labor income than programs which raise prices of farm products.O UR QUANTITATIVE knowledge of the markets for agricultural inputs continues to increase.' Heady and Tweeten's recent book [11] in particular has contributed significantly to our knowledge of the demand for agricultural inputs. Much remains to be done, however, on the supply side.The general objective of the research discussed here was to provide a more complete picture of the market for hired agricultural labor through the development of regional supply models that would complement previous studies of the national market [24] and the regional demand [25] for hired agricultural labor. Essentially this study applies a national model to regional problems.That regional analyses can be useful and are perhaps necessary in understanding the market for agricultural labor can be seen from Tables 1 and 2. Some historical data on regional differences in monetary wage rates in agriculture are shown in Table 1. Ruttan [21] and Wolfson [32] have shown that even after these money wages are corrected for regional variations in price level and the composition of the labor force, sizable differences remain. Wolfson [32] and Weatherford [31] argue that such o Purdue Agr. Exp. Sta., J. Paper 2703, Project 1107. Helpful comments and criticisms on an earlier draft of this article were received from