2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the positive stable block triangular preconditioner for generalized saddle point problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the inexact preconditioners are very important in practical computation since their iteration costs are much cheaper than exact preconditioners and the necessary iteration steps do not increase significantly. For the generalized saddle point problem (1), where the submatrix A is Hermitian positive definite, some inexact block triangular preconditioners are proposed in Simoncini, 18 Cao, 19 and Jiang et al 20 and improved eigenvalue bounds of the preconditioned matrices are studied in Cao et al 21 For a general block two-by-two non-Hermitian matrix, some inexact block triangular preconditioners are studied in Bai and Ng, 22 Peng and Li, 23 and Li et al 24 For standard saddle point problem where the (1,1) block matrix A is Hermitian positive definite and the (2,2) block matrix C is a zero matrix, an inexact constraint preconditioner is proposed in Bergamaschi et al 25 and spectral analysis of the inexact constraint preconditioned matrix is studied in Sesana and Simoncini. 26 In this article, we propose a class of inexact modified positive-definite and skew-Hermitian splitting (IMPSS) preconditioners for the generalized saddle point problem (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the inexact preconditioners are very important in practical computation since their iteration costs are much cheaper than exact preconditioners and the necessary iteration steps do not increase significantly. For the generalized saddle point problem (1), where the submatrix A is Hermitian positive definite, some inexact block triangular preconditioners are proposed in Simoncini, 18 Cao, 19 and Jiang et al 20 and improved eigenvalue bounds of the preconditioned matrices are studied in Cao et al 21 For a general block two-by-two non-Hermitian matrix, some inexact block triangular preconditioners are studied in Bai and Ng, 22 Peng and Li, 23 and Li et al 24 For standard saddle point problem where the (1,1) block matrix A is Hermitian positive definite and the (2,2) block matrix C is a zero matrix, an inexact constraint preconditioner is proposed in Bergamaschi et al 25 and spectral analysis of the inexact constraint preconditioned matrix is studied in Sesana and Simoncini. 26 In this article, we propose a class of inexact modified positive-definite and skew-Hermitian splitting (IMPSS) preconditioners for the generalized saddle point problem (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 20) implies that the vectors a (k) (k = 1, 2, 3) are zero vectors. Recalling that in (3.20) the first matrix arises from the case θ k = 1 (k = 1, · · · , n), the second matrix from the case θ k = 1 (k = 1, · · · , i), and the last matrix from the case…”
Section: Analysis Of the Rhss Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, much work also has been devoted to developing efficient preconditioners for saddle point problems. A variety of preconditioners have been proposed and studied in many papers, such as block diagonal and block triangular preconditioners [7,19,20,24], constraint preconditioners [8,25], HSS-based preconditioners [3,6,12,13,30], dimensional split preconditioners [15,16], H−matrix preconditioners [17] and so on. In [14], Benzi, Golub and Liesen discussed a selection of numerical methods and useful preconditioners for saddle point problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%