A Note on the Reproducibility of Chaos Simulation

Abstract

An evergreen scientific feature is the ability for scientific works to be reproduced. Since chaotic systems are so hard to understand analytically, numerical simulations assume a key role in their investigation. Such simulations have been considered as reproducible in many works. However, few studies have focused on the effects of the finite precision of computers on the simulation reproducibility of chaotic systems; moreover, code sharing and details on how to reproduce simulation results are not present in many investigations. In this work, a case study of reproducibility is presented in the simulation of a chaotic jerk circuit, using the software LTspice. We also employ the OSF platform to share the project associated with this paper. Tests performed with LTspice XVII on four different computers show the difficulties of simulation reproducibility by this software. We compare these results with experimental data using a normalised root mean square error in order to identify the computer with the highest prediction horizon. We also calculate the entropy of the signals to check differences among computer simulations and the practical experiment. The methodology developed is efficient in identifying the computer with better performance, which allows applying it to other cases in the literature. This investigation is fully described and available on the OSF platform.

A Novel Chaotic System with a Line Equilibrium: Analysis and Its Applications to Secure Communication and Random Bit Generation

“…It is worth noting here that as far as the numerical evaluation of the chaotic system in the transmitter and receiver ends is concerned, there are instances where errors can arise, that may lead to degradation of the design. Examples can include round-off errors that arise when a different error tolerance is chosen between transmitter and receiver, or errors that arise when a different integration step is chosen or different numerical methods are used to solve the system; see for example, discussions in the recent works [52][53][54]. This is one of the main obstacles that have so far held up the possible commercialization of chaos-based secure communications.…”

A Self-Adaptive Algorithm of the Clean Numerical Simulation (CNS) for Chaos

“…Thus, for a chaotic dynamical system, calculated trajectories of computer-generated simulations obtained by means of different numerical algorithms (with single/double precision) and different time steps are mostly quite different. Naturally, such kind of nonreplicability/unreliability of chaotic solution has brought plenty of heated debates on the credence of the numerical simulation of chaotic dynamical system [35], and someone even made an extremely pessimistic conclusion that "for chaotic systems, numerical convergence cannot be guaranteed forever" [47]. In addition, it has been recently reported that "shadowing solutions can be almost surely nonphysical", which "invalidates the argument that small perturbations in a chaotic system can only have a small impact on its statistical behavior" [4].…”

Computational chaos control based on small perturbations for complex spectra simulation

“…But in fact, it is not 100% natural chaos, it is degraded chaos due to computational limitations. 29–32 This can cause irreproducible and unreliable results, Nazaré et al 33 studied this topic.…”

“…[29][30][31][32] This can cause irreproducible and unreliable results, Nazare ét al. 33 studied this topic. As Ott et al 5 point out in their pioneering paper, any chaotic dynamic system can be controlled to be used by different purposes at different times.…”