1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(83)90589-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the tip noise of rotating blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the term on the left side of equation ( 24) is recognized as the thickness source term in equation ( 19) and the term on the right side of equation ( 24) is the loading source term of equation ( 19) with with a constant pressure jump p − p o = ρ o c 2 . Although mathematically equivalent, the two formulations for thickness noise have quite different characteristics and robustness when integrated numerically [38]. More examples of the nonuniqueness of the source description are given by Ffowcs Williams [39] and Kanwal [32].…”
Section: Interpretation and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the term on the left side of equation ( 24) is recognized as the thickness source term in equation ( 19) and the term on the right side of equation ( 24) is the loading source term of equation ( 19) with with a constant pressure jump p − p o = ρ o c 2 . Although mathematically equivalent, the two formulations for thickness noise have quite different characteristics and robustness when integrated numerically [38]. More examples of the nonuniqueness of the source description are given by Ffowcs Williams [39] and Kanwal [32].…”
Section: Interpretation and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly 30 chordwise divisions and 75 equally spaced spanwise divisions are needed for the computation to converge completely for this test case. After applying the consistency test, it is shown that in the numerical study, the calculated Isom noise and the monopole noise do not agree exactly in amplitude as already noticed by Farassat [16,17,18], (See Figure 13). Theoretically, the sources on the airfoil-shaped cut at the very tip and the inner radius of the blade, which were neglected in the previous calculations, must be included in noise prediction (See Figure 14).…”
Section: Tc4: Isom Thickness Noisementioning
confidence: 66%
“…Aspects of helicopter rotor noise of particular interest include blade and tip noise [38,39,40] and blade vortex interaction (BVI) noise [41]; the latter accounts for the characteristic slapping noise of helicopters [42], heard by the human ear and recorded in experiments [33,43]. The helicopter rotor noise consists of discrete tones [44,45,46] plus a continuous broadband [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%