1986
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1986.10475420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on the Transformation of Chi-Squared Variables to Normality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first calculated for each gene set its SUMSTAT score, which is the sum of selection scores of genes in the set of interest (Tintle et al 2009; Daub et al 2013). As selection score we took the fourth-root of the ΔlnL g values (called ΔlnL4 hereafter) to ensure that the distribution of nonzero ΔlnLs is approximately Normal (Hawkins and Wixley 1986; Roux et al 2014). This procedure also prevents extreme scoring genes from getting too much weight in the test, which would otherwise result in significant pathways mostly due to a few outlier genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first calculated for each gene set its SUMSTAT score, which is the sum of selection scores of genes in the set of interest (Tintle et al 2009; Daub et al 2013). As selection score we took the fourth-root of the ΔlnL g values (called ΔlnL4 hereafter) to ensure that the distribution of nonzero ΔlnLs is approximately Normal (Hawkins and Wixley 1986; Roux et al 2014). This procedure also prevents extreme scoring genes from getting too much weight in the test, which would otherwise result in significant pathways mostly due to a few outlier genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation was evaluated using a rmANOVA. The dependent measure was the Chi-square values characterizing the quality of the function fit, transformed by applying an exponent of 0.25 to approximate a normal distribution (Hawkins and Wixley 1986). The independent variables were dataset (novel-stimulus, mean of five repeated-stimulus runs, all repeated-stimulus runs pooled), and masker (multi-talker babble, speech-shaped noise, AM noise).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2, for a justification of the choice λ = 1 3 ). Hawkins and Wixley (1986) have argued that the approximation can be improved for smaller values of a by using λ = 1 4 . In what follows, we compare the foregoing two methods for approximating gamma quantiles.…”
Section: Normal Approximations and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the associate editors' comments resulted in the clarification of several ideas, and the associate editor also drew the author's attention to the work of Hernandez and Johnson (1980) and Hawkins and Wixley (1986). The research of Krishnamoorthy and Mathew was supported by National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health grant R01-OH03628.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation