1993
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Total Antieigenvectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that although these expressions may appear complicated, they may be clearly understood as sets analogous to those previously identified for single compact normal operators, see [9,10,14,15]. …”
Section: µ 1 (T S) For Elements Of Closed Normal Subalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We remark that although these expressions may appear complicated, they may be clearly understood as sets analogous to those previously identified for single compact normal operators, see [9,10,14,15]. …”
Section: µ 1 (T S) For Elements Of Closed Normal Subalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We call µ 1 (T , S) the joint antieigenvalue of T and S. We also call a vector f for which the infimum in (2) is attained a joint antieigenvector of T and S. The author and Karl Gustafson have studied µ 1 (T ) for normal operators on finite and infinite dimensional spaces [9,10,15]. See also Davis [1] and Mirman [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He found some partial and implicit results for (6) when T is an accretive normal matrix on a finite dimensional Hilbert space. In [5] and [6] Gustafson and Seddighin found more explicit results for (6), assuming that T is a normal matrix on a finite dimensional space. They proved that in this case (6) is always expressed by at most two eigenvalues of T. This property that later was generalized by Seddighin as The Two Nonzero Component Lemma (or TNCL for short) was implicitly proved in [5].…”
Section: M Tx X T X X X H X Mmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A geometric proof for this lemma in the finite dimensional case is implicit in the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [5]. Using the notations in the Lemma 1 above, in …”
Section: M Tx X T X X X H X Mmmentioning
confidence: 99%