“…We remark that although these expressions may appear complicated, they may be clearly understood as sets analogous to those previously identified for single compact normal operators, see [9,10,14,15]. …”
Section: µ 1 (T S) For Elements Of Closed Normal Subalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We call µ 1 (T , S) the joint antieigenvalue of T and S. We also call a vector f for which the infimum in (2) is attained a joint antieigenvector of T and S. The author and Karl Gustafson have studied µ 1 (T ) for normal operators on finite and infinite dimensional spaces [9,10,15]. See also Davis [1] and Mirman [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following two theorems, summarize what we know, as to date, about µ 1 (T ) for normal operators T . See [9,10,14] for their proofs. We will use these results in the following analysis of normal subalgebras.…”
We will study the joint antieigenvalues of pairs of operators that belong to the same closed normal subalgebra of B(H ). This extends antieigenvalue theory from single normal operators to pairs of commuting normal operators.
“…We remark that although these expressions may appear complicated, they may be clearly understood as sets analogous to those previously identified for single compact normal operators, see [9,10,14,15]. …”
Section: µ 1 (T S) For Elements Of Closed Normal Subalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We call µ 1 (T , S) the joint antieigenvalue of T and S. We also call a vector f for which the infimum in (2) is attained a joint antieigenvector of T and S. The author and Karl Gustafson have studied µ 1 (T ) for normal operators on finite and infinite dimensional spaces [9,10,15]. See also Davis [1] and Mirman [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following two theorems, summarize what we know, as to date, about µ 1 (T ) for normal operators T . See [9,10,14] for their proofs. We will use these results in the following analysis of normal subalgebras.…”
We will study the joint antieigenvalues of pairs of operators that belong to the same closed normal subalgebra of B(H ). This extends antieigenvalue theory from single normal operators to pairs of commuting normal operators.
“…He found some partial and implicit results for (6) when T is an accretive normal matrix on a finite dimensional Hilbert space. In [5] and [6] Gustafson and Seddighin found more explicit results for (6), assuming that T is a normal matrix on a finite dimensional space. They proved that in this case (6) is always expressed by at most two eigenvalues of T. This property that later was generalized by Seddighin as The Two Nonzero Component Lemma (or TNCL for short) was implicitly proved in [5].…”
Section: M Tx X T X X X H X Mmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A geometric proof for this lemma in the finite dimensional case is implicit in the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [5]. Using the notations in the Lemma 1 above, in …”
We will extend some of the Kantorovich-Type inequalities for positive finite dimensional matrices to infinite dimensional normal operators by applying The Two-Nonzero Component Lemma and converting them to an Antieigenvalue-Type problem.
In this entry, the concepts of antieigenvalues and antieigenvectors are first introduced. Then, various statistical situations wherein these entities arise naturally are explained.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.