1976
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1976-0458156-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on unconditionally converging series in 𝐿_{𝑝}

Abstract: In an effort to find a principle underlying such generalizations, we were led to the theorem stated in the abstract which reduces certain questions of a.e. convergence for u.c. series in L to the same questions for orthogonal series.Recall that a series 27; in X is unconditionally convergent if the map T(otj) = 2 ajfj is continuous as an operator from lx to X. Further, since the natural injection of L into L, is continuous when/? > 1, an unconditionally convergent series in L with p > 1 may as well be consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such sequences f j are called "unconditionally convergent," and are wellknown to enjoy many of the properties of orthogonal series. The most elegant result in this direction is one due to Ørno [8] which dilates the f j to an orthogonal series, but we cannot easily deduce our quantitative inequality from his. Our lemma is a close cousin of one due to G. Bennett, Theorem 2.5 of [1]; we do not include a proof because the lemma is easily obtained from the classical method of dyadic decomposition.…”
Section: Definition For Two Rectangles I ×ω and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sequences f j are called "unconditionally convergent," and are wellknown to enjoy many of the properties of orthogonal series. The most elegant result in this direction is one due to Ørno [8] which dilates the f j to an orthogonal series, but we cannot easily deduce our quantitative inequality from his. Our lemma is a close cousin of one due to G. Bennett, Theorem 2.5 of [1]; we do not include a proof because the lemma is easily obtained from the classical method of dyadic decomposition.…”
Section: Definition For Two Rectangles I ×ω and Imentioning
confidence: 99%