2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2571-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on using the resistance-distance matrix to solve Hamiltonian cycle problem

Abstract: An instance of Hamiltonian cycle problem can be solved by converting it to an instance of Travelling salesman problem, assigning any choice of weights to edges of the underlying graph. In this note we demonstrate that, for difficult instances, choosing the edge weights to be the resistance distance between its two incident vertices is often a good choice. We also demonstrate that arguably stronger performance arises from using the inverse of the resistance distance. Examples are provided demonstrating benefits… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ejov et al (2019), the authors consider the entire set of resistance distances (again using unit values for edges), between any pair of nodes (not only leaves.) They show that using this metric is useful for discovering Hamiltonian cycles via algorithms for the Traveling Salesman problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ejov et al (2019), the authors consider the entire set of resistance distances (again using unit values for edges), between any pair of nodes (not only leaves.) They show that using this metric is useful for discovering Hamiltonian cycles via algorithms for the Traveling Salesman problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], the authors consider the entire set of resistance distances (again using unit values for edges), between any pair of nodes (not only leaves.) They show that using this metric is useful for discovering Hamiltonian cycles via algorithms for the Travelling Salesman problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%