1990
DOI: 10.1086/185702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nova-like red variable in M31

Abstract: A late-type supergiant which appeared in the bulge of M31 in the last observing season faded 3 bolometric magnitudes in 100 days and is now no longer detectable. We suggest the object was a nova of an unusual type. Subject headings: galaxies: individual (M31) -stars: late-type -stars: novae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that the standard deviation of an individual m v estimate is similar to that for an m B estimate. Our m v observations are useful to show that RV was a very red object in agreement with observations presented by Rich et al (1989) and Mould et al (1990).…”
Section: Magnitude Systemsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, we believe that the standard deviation of an individual m v estimate is similar to that for an m B estimate. Our m v observations are useful to show that RV was a very red object in agreement with observations presented by Rich et al (1989) and Mould et al (1990).…”
Section: Magnitude Systemsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Apart form V838 Mon, in our Galaxy the class also includes V4332 Sgr, whose outburst was observed in 1994 (Martini et al 1999), and V1309 Sco, which erupted in 2008 (Mason et al 2010). As extragalactic eruptions of this kind one can mention M 31 RV (eruption in 1989, Mould et al 1990), M 85 OT2006 (Kulkarni et al 2007), and NGC300 OT2008 (Berger et al 2009). Several interpretations of the eruptions were proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(2007)) to have physical properties inconsistent with all of the nova models in Paper I. While thermonuclear-powered nova eruptions can explain the luminosities of these objects, their massive and very cool ejecta seem totally different from those of other novae (Mould et al (1990), Bond et al (2003), Munari et al (2002), Banerjee & Ashok (2002), Kimeswenger et al (2002), Soker & Tylenda (2003), Kipper, Klochkova, & Annuk (2004), Lynch et al (2004)). Does the nova model fail for these objects?…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%