2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel 3D co-culture platform for integrating tissue interfaces for tumor growth, migration and therapeutic sensitivity: “PP-3D-S”

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D cultures, where cells grow in three dimensions ( 40 ), better represent cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular environment interactions, morphology and cell division, and permit access to oxygen, nutrients, metabolites, and signaling molecules or cytokines ( 37 , 41 , 42 ). The use of 3D co-cultures is also highly relevant, since the characteristics of cells and their responses, including to drugs, can differ based on whether they are cultured in two versus three dimensions ( 42 ). Yet in both cases, while the cellular environments are more realistic, the means of assessing macrophage polarization becomes more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D cultures, where cells grow in three dimensions ( 40 ), better represent cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular environment interactions, morphology and cell division, and permit access to oxygen, nutrients, metabolites, and signaling molecules or cytokines ( 37 , 41 , 42 ). The use of 3D co-cultures is also highly relevant, since the characteristics of cells and their responses, including to drugs, can differ based on whether they are cultured in two versus three dimensions ( 42 ). Yet in both cases, while the cellular environments are more realistic, the means of assessing macrophage polarization becomes more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhering cell populations in the 3D mat network of Figure 2 are typically increased by plasma treatments (i) or (ii) by a factor of 5 or more compared with untreated (“control”) sample surfaces. [ 19,21 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group recently reported using O 2 plasma‐modified NF mat samples as 3D scaffolds, seeded with human fibroblasts to mimic a stromal tissue layer; cell adhesion on all three greatly exceeded that on untreated controls. [ 19 ] After 7 days, cell behaviors were virtually indistinguishable among the three materials, quite surprising if one considers their very different structures and mechanical stiffness characteristics: Tensile moduli (Young's modulus as an index of stiffness) of electrospun NF mats are roughly between 50 and 300, 5–50, and 0.5–2 MPa, depending on fiber sizes, for PLA, [ 26 ] PCL, [ 27 ] and PU, [ 28 ] respectively. In other words, the choice of three polymers ranging from very soft (PU) to medium (PCL) and high stiffness (PLA) values is an asset for this aging‐related investigation because Stachewicz [ 23 ] had also identified mechanical properties to have a strong bearing in wetting studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 3D cultures, where cells grow in three dimensions, 40 better represent cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular environment interactions, morphology and cell division, and access to oxygen, nutrients, metabolites, and signaling molecules or cytokines. 37,41,42 The use of 3D co-cultures is also highly relevant, since the characteristics of cells and their responses, including to drugs, can be differ based on whether they are cultured in two versus three dimensions. 42 In both cases, however, while the cellular environments are more realistic, the means of assessing macrophage polarization becomes more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,41,42 The use of 3D co-cultures is also highly relevant, since the characteristics of cells and their responses, including to drugs, can be differ based on whether they are cultured in two versus three dimensions. 42 In both cases, however, while the cellular environments are more realistic, the means of assessing macrophage polarization becomes more difficult. For this reason, we generated a reporter cell line to track the expression of a phenotype-associated marker in relevant disease models over time and following drug treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%