2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0780-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel 3D-printed hybrid simulation model for robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT)

Abstract: Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) offers key benefits for patients that have been demonstrated in several studies. A barrier to the wider uptake of RAKT is surgical skill acquisition. This is exacerbated by the challenges of modern surgery with reduced surgical training time, patient safety concerns and financial pressures. Simulation is a well-established method of developing surgical skill in a safe and controlled environment away from the patient. We have developed a 3D printed simulation model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 3D-printed simulators replicating the iliac fossa and kidney transplant allograft have been described in the practice of open or robotic vascular anastomoses of kidney transplants, their higher cosmetic fidelity likely offers little educational advantages compared to our bench-top simulator, as mimicking the critical steps of a procedure rather than fidelity level is most important in skill acquisition [9,15,16]. Moreover, creating a high cosmetic fidelity replicate of the iliac fossa and allograft costs approximately $1,000 more without added education benefits such as obtaining exposure, placing retractors, or dissection [15]. As opposed to the easy assembly of our bench-top simulator, the production of a 3Dprinted simulator requires approximately seven days of labor and technical expertise for imaging reconstruction from thin-cut CT imaging, working the printer, and choosing adequate ink [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although 3D-printed simulators replicating the iliac fossa and kidney transplant allograft have been described in the practice of open or robotic vascular anastomoses of kidney transplants, their higher cosmetic fidelity likely offers little educational advantages compared to our bench-top simulator, as mimicking the critical steps of a procedure rather than fidelity level is most important in skill acquisition [9,15,16]. Moreover, creating a high cosmetic fidelity replicate of the iliac fossa and allograft costs approximately $1,000 more without added education benefits such as obtaining exposure, placing retractors, or dissection [15]. As opposed to the easy assembly of our bench-top simulator, the production of a 3Dprinted simulator requires approximately seven days of labor and technical expertise for imaging reconstruction from thin-cut CT imaging, working the printer, and choosing adequate ink [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to the easy assembly of our bench-top simulator, the production of a 3Dprinted simulator requires approximately seven days of labor and technical expertise for imaging reconstruction from thin-cut CT imaging, working the printer, and choosing adequate ink [16]. A 3D-printed 'hybrid' simulator has also been described using expired deceased donor iliac vessels instead of synthetic material to simulate vascular anastomosis [15]. Although more realistic, the disadvantages of expired deceased donor iliac vessels include a limited supply and the risk of infection transmission despite testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experts and trainees rated the simulation superior to digital virtual reality (VR) trainers and experts performed better than residents in the simulation. Uwechue developed a 3D-printed simulation model for vascular anastomosis during robot-assisted kidney transplant, highlighting potential training value even amongst experienced surgeons when learning new surgical techniques (33). Pinto reported an observed improvement in residents microsurgical suture time and quality on a vasectomy reversal model produced via 3D-printing (41).…”
Section: Surgical Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the rise of robot-assisted surgery for a variety of surgical procedures has significantly reshaped surgical practice [35], although the safety of the patient remains essential. The robotic platform enables surgeons to operate more accurately during difficult procedures compared to conventional laparoscopy, which provides high resolution three-dimensional (3D) operative views and improves depth perception, as well as superior instrument handling [6, 7]. 3D printing, in addition to the standard medical imaging, may represent an invaluable tool to allow a good representation of surgical scenario, particularly in challenging cases [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%