“…Remarkably, the energy density of the ASC decreases from 0.33 to 0.18 mW h cm −2 as the power density increases from 1.5 to 15 mW cm −2 . Obviously, the ASC device in this work outperforms most of the previously reported nanomaterials, such as PANI/MCNTs-rGO/TPU fiber (3.45 μW h cm −2 ), 62 ZnO nanowire array-modified fiber (0.027 μW h cm −2 ), 63 all-graphene fiber (0.17 μW h cm −2 ), 64 CNT@Co 3 O 4 yarn (1.10 μW h cm −2 ), 54 CuO@CoFe-LDH NWAs (93.75 μW h cm −2 ), 28 Cu wire/CuO NWs (9.31 μW h cm −2 ), 55 CuO/Co(OH) 2 /rGO (3.33 μW h cm −2 ), 56 GO-(FeCl 3 )/PPy@PLA (3.5 μW h cm −2 ), 65 PVA/PA-PANI (31.7 μW h cm −2 ), 66 and PEDOT:PSS/CNP (30.86 μW h cm −2 ). 67 EIS was also conducted to evaluate the performance of the ASC, and the corresponding Nyquist plot shows R s and R ct values of 0.694 and 7.6 Ω, respectively, in Figure 4e, indicating that the composite material is a potential candidate to meet the requirements of a high-performance ASC device.…”