“…One disadvantage of HMDS is its poor silylating power in the absence of a suitable catalyst, needing forceful conditions and long reaction times in many cases. [10] To solve this problem, a variety of catalysts, including (CH 3 ) 3 SiCl, [11] ZrCl 4 , [12] ZnCl 2 , [13] K-10 montmorillonite, [14] LiClO 4 , [15] H 3 PW 12 O 40 , [16] iodine, [17] InBr 3 , [18] zirconium sulfophenyl phosphonate, [19] CuSO 4 .5H 2 O, [20] sulfonic acid-functionalized nanoporous silica, [21] MgBr 2 ·OEt 2 , [22] LaCl 3 , [23] poly(N-bromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide) and N,N,N ,Ntetrabromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide, [24] Fe(TFA) 3 , [25] Fe 3 O 4 , [26] (n-Bu 4 N)Br, [27] trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA), [28] HClO 4 -SiO 2 , [29] Pd [30] and ZrO(OTf) 2 , [31] have been reported for trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols. Although these procedures provide an improvement, many of the catalysts or activators need long reaction times, drastic reaction conditions or tedious workups, or are moisture-sensitive or expensive.…”