2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for interpreting the solidification behaviour of peritectic steels by combining CSLM and DSC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the cooling under an argon atmosphere gave a liquidus much lower than that of predicted equilibrium solidification, which was expect as nucleation was limited from the free surface (the high purity of the atmosphere means that no inclusions or surface oxides were observed) and; therefore, a large undercooling was required locally before solidification was seen. This is consistent with previous work on the CSLM, where the smooth crucible surface and small sample size can reduce the chance of a nucleation event significantly [20]. Under a CO 2 atmosphere, the newly formed surface oxide can act as nucleation sites, and this minimises the undercooling required to a point where the liquidus matches very closely to the equilibrium predicted value (it is also possible some carbon was removed during oxidation, which would increase the liquidus; this is expected to be a minor influence as oxygen is predicted to more favourably bond with Al and Si, compared to forming CO (Factsage 7.2, Aachen, Germany)).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the cooling under an argon atmosphere gave a liquidus much lower than that of predicted equilibrium solidification, which was expect as nucleation was limited from the free surface (the high purity of the atmosphere means that no inclusions or surface oxides were observed) and; therefore, a large undercooling was required locally before solidification was seen. This is consistent with previous work on the CSLM, where the smooth crucible surface and small sample size can reduce the chance of a nucleation event significantly [20]. Under a CO 2 atmosphere, the newly formed surface oxide can act as nucleation sites, and this minimises the undercooling required to a point where the liquidus matches very closely to the equilibrium predicted value (it is also possible some carbon was removed during oxidation, which would increase the liquidus; this is expected to be a minor influence as oxygen is predicted to more favourably bond with Al and Si, compared to forming CO (Factsage 7.2, Aachen, Germany)).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As the samples' surfaces changed emissivity, both during solidification and in the presence of a surface product, the stated temperatures in this paper refer to this calibrated point, and was, hence, why the distance away from the sample was limited to 500 µm. This method has shown very good agreement previously, where the impact of any thermal lag was shown to be negligible using differential calorimetry [19,20]. Therefore, the readings taken from the surface act to provide information on when events occur, rather than providing a direct temperature reading itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The solidus and liquidus temperatures and another transformation temperatures of iron, steel and other alloys can be determined, for example, by the use of differential thermal analysis (DTA), with the help of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), or with the use of thermal-derivative analysis (TDA) [1,21,[26][27][28][29][30]. However, when considering the dimensions and possible chemical and structural inhomogeneity of the analyzed sample, it is very difficult to precisely determine the solidus temperature with the use of the sophisticated DTA and DSC methods [1,7,18,28,31]. Won and Thomas [32] reported that during the solidification processes, an important role is also played by microsegregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ferritic grain coarsening and the precipitation of carbides result in decreased ductility between 800 and 900 • C. He et al [18] found high-Cr-content ferrite stainless steel suffers from embrittlement when subjected to temperatures up to around 475 • C, due to the separation of the α (Fe-rich) ferrite and the α (Cr-rich) ferrite and the transformation of the Fe-rich α phase and the Cr-rich α phase to the α-(Fe,Cr) ferrite phase by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Hechu et al [20] found the solid-state transformation of a δ dendrite core to a single γ phase without a peritectic reaction at 1358 • C. Some researches [15,21,22] show that the increase of Al content leads to a worse hot ductility and high Al content in steel can easily lead to deterioration of surface quality of continuous casting slabs [23]. However, Su et al [12] found that the increase of Al content in TRIP steel (0.03-0.87% Al) led to an overall increase of a reduction of area (RA) and better hot ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%