2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for modeling and optimization of surfactant/polymer flooding based on Genetic Programming evolutionary algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first introduced by Koza [34]. In this method, the mathematical expressions are generated using input-output data by a biologically inspired algorithm, where the population continuously evolves towards the best-fitted model [35]. GP and the genetic algorithm (GA) have some similarities, while the most important difference is the output format.…”
Section: Genetic Programming (Gp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was first introduced by Koza [34]. In this method, the mathematical expressions are generated using input-output data by a biologically inspired algorithm, where the population continuously evolves towards the best-fitted model [35]. GP and the genetic algorithm (GA) have some similarities, while the most important difference is the output format.…”
Section: Genetic Programming (Gp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of GA is a value, whereas the output of GP is a computer program. The complicated structures of computer programs, mathematical expressions, and process system models in GP are represented with trees [35,36].…”
Section: Genetic Programming (Gp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… The economic cost of the chemical injection reduced the NPV of all scenarios in the Lula IFS, despite increasing the oil recovery factor. Therefore, the associated costs of CEOR program play a fundamental role in its applicability, a behavior observed previously by Bahrami et al (2016) and Kamari et al (2016) researches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%