2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to control the properties of austenitic stainless steels in incremental forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They detect a relationship between the parameters of the forming process, the residual stresses, and mechanical characteristics of an incrementally formed part [19]. Katajarinne et al [20] established a progressive method for adjusting material properties, including ductility and strength for the parts produced by incrementally shaping metal sheets. They controlled properties by controlling the martensitic transformation induced by deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They detect a relationship between the parameters of the forming process, the residual stresses, and mechanical characteristics of an incrementally formed part [19]. Katajarinne et al [20] established a progressive method for adjusting material properties, including ductility and strength for the parts produced by incrementally shaping metal sheets. They controlled properties by controlling the martensitic transformation induced by deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the top of the geometry, i.e., Location 4, the effect of the tensile stress superposition is no longer apparent, and other parameters affecting the phase transformation, e.g., temperature, may become dominant since the strain levels at Locations 3 and 4 are comparable for TSSIF (Figure 6a). The decrease in volume percent of α'-martensite observed for TSSIF when comparing Locations 3 and 4 may be caused by the increased temperature in the forming area (see Figure 3b), which is known to inhibit austenite to martensite phase transformation [8,17]. Note that correction factors based on the material thickness are provided by the manufacturer (but not included in these results) and may result in martensitic volume fractions up to 1.15 times those reported in this work [18].…”
Section: Phase Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austenitic stainless steels, which undergo strain-induced transformation into a stronger, more brittle phase, i.e., martensite [5,6], are of interest for many applications, including the automotive, aerospace, and biomedical industries. Several studies have investigated the extent to which the phase transformation from γ-austenite to α'-martensite can be influenced by adjusting the process parameters e.g., in SPIF [7,8] and deep drawing [9]. This also affects the material formability [10] and residual stress development [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no study dealing with a targeted adjustment of the residual stresses and the development of the residual stresses in MASS by ISF has been reported. The only study identified in the literature dealing with ISF and MASS was proposed by Katajarinne et al [24]. They developed a novel approach for regulating the mechanical properties, i.e., strength and ductility during the incremental forming of MASS by controlling the formation of strain-induced martensite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%