1991
DOI: 10.1016/0960-1481(91)90112-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to estimate the clear day global radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, for air temperature estimation, the method proposed by De Wit et al (1978) is used, which is based on a sinusoidal algorithm considering sunrise and sunset hours. The Baig et al (1991) model is used for incoming shortwave radiation computation based on a Gaussian curve. Rainfall, wind velocity and relative air humidity are assumed constant during the day.…”
Section: Meteorological Ground Stationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for air temperature estimation, the method proposed by De Wit et al (1978) is used, which is based on a sinusoidal algorithm considering sunrise and sunset hours. The Baig et al (1991) model is used for incoming shortwave radiation computation based on a Gaussian curve. Rainfall, wind velocity and relative air humidity are assumed constant during the day.…”
Section: Meteorological Ground Stationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jain (1984, 1988 established DGSRD models, and then Baig et al (1991) and Shazly (1996) respectively introduced correction factors to the Jain model based on a Gaussian distribution function. It is noted that these models propose the assumption that the variation of weather conditions are air temperature at hours n À 2 (°C) t max daily maximum air temperature (°C) t min daily minimum air temperature (°C) a solar azimuth angle (degree) x solar hour angle (degree) x 0 sunrise hour angle, cos…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various attempts to predict the HGSR for any given day of the year, a significant work (Kaplanis and Kaplani 2007) reported a model that discussed about derived constants A and B which are location dependent and requires a one-day measured data. Another model (Baig, Achter, and Mufti 1991), attempts to fit the solar radiation data using Gaussian function, but the parameters in the function are difficult to estimate for locations with scarce recorded data. A higher order polynomial model was proposed by Al-sadah, Ragab, and Arshad (1990) which was found to statistically fit better with the measured data, but it is limited to only standard atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%