2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3264831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach Toward Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Rough Dombi Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Decision-Making Problems

Abstract: It is the purpose of this paper to present and explain the fuzzy set of concepts Zadeh that are discussed in membership grade. We also demonstrate that three-way analysis is crucial in decision-making systems. In order to implement a three-way decision, various elements are required, such as conditional probability, estimated loss, and decision rules. The objective is to describe first the Q-ROFRS (Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Rough Set) to define some fundamental operational rules under the dombi norms. The use of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when examining the squares of these values, 0.70 2 + 0.70 2 + 0.80 2 equals 1.49, surpassing the acceptable limit for aggregation operators under a spherical fuzzy environment. Therefore, we compare the results of the suggested method with some existing approaches that uses 𝑑 βˆ’spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [37][38][39] and 𝑝, π‘ž, π‘Ÿ βˆ’spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [40] in order to confirm the findings drawn from it. The results obtained by these approaches are summerized in Table 8.…”
Section: B Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, when examining the squares of these values, 0.70 2 + 0.70 2 + 0.80 2 equals 1.49, surpassing the acceptable limit for aggregation operators under a spherical fuzzy environment. Therefore, we compare the results of the suggested method with some existing approaches that uses 𝑑 βˆ’spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [37][38][39] and 𝑝, π‘ž, π‘Ÿ βˆ’spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [40] in order to confirm the findings drawn from it. The results obtained by these approaches are summerized in Table 8.…”
Section: B Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The suggested MAGDM approach is compared against a number of current operators in this section, including Tspherical fuzzy aggregation operators [48][49][50], 𝑝, π‘ž, π‘Ÿ βˆ’spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [25,51], and spherical fuzzy aggregation operators [52,53]. Table 10 combines the ideal score values with the options' order of ranking.…”
Section: F Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%