2019
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel biosimulator based on ex vivo porcine lungs for training in peripheral tissue sampling using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath

Abstract: Background: Although radial probe endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) with a guide sheath (GS; EBUS-GS) is widely used for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), a standard training model for EBUS-GS remains to be developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel pulmonary biosimulator for hands-on training in peripheral tissue sampling using EBUS-GS Methods: We established a novel biosimulator for EBUS-GS using porcine lungs. The simulator was equipped with multiple pseud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human cadavers have been used in training bronchoscopic procedures and were favored over manikin models for educational purposes [17,18], which is in consistency with the findings of this study. Porcine lungs are promising models for hands-on training of bronchoscopic procedures and the histological structure of the respiratory tract is similar to humans [19][20][21]. However, the difference in anatomy was commented on by multiple participants.…”
Section: Anatomical Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human cadavers have been used in training bronchoscopic procedures and were favored over manikin models for educational purposes [17,18], which is in consistency with the findings of this study. Porcine lungs are promising models for hands-on training of bronchoscopic procedures and the histological structure of the respiratory tract is similar to humans [19][20][21]. However, the difference in anatomy was commented on by multiple participants.…”
Section: Anatomical Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%