A Novel Brief Therapy for Patients Who Attempt Suicide: A 24-months Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Study of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP)

Abstract

BackgroundAttempted suicide is the main risk factor for suicide and repeated suicide attempts. However, the evidence for follow-up treatments reducing suicidal behavior in these patients is limited. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) in reducing suicidal behavior. ASSIP is a novel brief therapy based on a patient-centered model of suicidal behavior, with an emphasis on early therapeutic alliance.Methods and FindingsPatients who had recently attempted suicide were randomly allocated to treatment as usual (n = 60) or treatment as usual plus ASSIP (n = 60). ASSIP participants received three therapy sessions followed by regular contact through personalized letters over 24 months. Participants considered to be at high risk of suicide were included, 63% were diagnosed with an affective disorder, and 50% had a history of prior suicide attempts. Clinical exclusion criteria were habitual self-harm, serious cognitive impairment, and psychotic disorder. Study participants completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months over a 24-month follow-up period.The study represents a real-world clinical setting at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital of psychiatry. The primary outcome measure was repeat suicide attempts during the 24-month follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures were suicidal ideation, depression, and health-care utilization. Furthermore, effects of prior suicide attempts, depression at baseline, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance on outcome were investigated.During the 24-month follow-up period, five repeat suicide attempts were recorded in the ASSIP group and 41 attempts in the control group. The rates of participants reattempting suicide at least once were 8.3% (n = 5) and 26.7% (n = 16). ASSIP was associated with an approximately 80% reduced risk of participants making at least one repeat suicide attempt (Wald χ2 1 = 13.1, 95% CI 12.4–13.7, p < 0.001). ASSIP participants spent 72% fewer days in the hospital during follow-up (ASSIP: 29 d; control group: 105 d; W = 94.5, p = 0.038). Higher scores of patient-rated therapeutic alliance in the ASSIP group were associated with a lower rate of repeat suicide attempts. Prior suicide attempts, depression, and a diagnosis of personality disorder at baseline did not significantly affect outcome. Participants with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (n = 20) had more previous suicide attempts and a higher number of reattempts.Key study limitations were missing data and dropout rates. Although both were generally low, they increased during follow-up. At 24 months, the group difference in dropout rate was significant: ASSIP, 7% (n = 4); control, 22% (n = 13). A further limitation is that we do not have detailed information of the co-active follow-up treatment apart from participant self-reports every 6 months on the setting and the duration of the co-active treatment.ConclusionsASSIP, a manual-based brief therapy for patients who have re...

Cognitive behavioural therapy halves the risk of repeated suicide attempts: systematic review

“…Cognitive behavioural therapy compared to treatment as usual reduced the risk of a new suicide attempt ( Figure 1; risk ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.73; p ¼ 0.0009; I 2 ¼ 57%; ten trials, 1241 patients and 219 events). One trial was an outlier with an unusually large effect; 22 if this trial is excluded, the risk ratio becomes 0.61 (0.46-0.80) and the heterogeneity in the results disappears (I 2 ¼ 0%). Computerised randomisation with allocation concealment; 1 outcome assessment was blinded; none lost to follow-up after six months.…”

Pathways to Attempted Suicide as Reflected in the Narratives of People with Lived Experience

“…Previous suicide attempts are also the most important risk factors for suicide (Gysin-Maillart et al 2016;Roelands et al 2017). The risk increases with each subsequent suicide attempt and remains high for over 30 years.…”

“…About 90% of the people who have attempted suicide will survive; therefore, a suicide attempt is definitely one reason to look for professional help to resolve problems (Retterstøl and Mehlum 2001). However, a major barrier to effective treatment is poor treatment compliance; 50% of people fail to participate in treatment because patients often feel that they are not understood (Gysin-Maillart et al 2016).…”

Risikoabschätzung bei suizidalen Patienten: Geht das überhaupt?

“…Hierzu gehören beispielsweise Strategien wie die Sicherung letaler Mittel [Bryan et al, 2011], die Erstellung von Notfallplänen [Bryan et al, 2017] sowie intensivierte Kontaktangebote [Milner et al, 2015]. Darüber hinaus haben sich indizierte Prä-ventionsangebote für Patienten nach einem Suizidversuch als hochwirksam erwiesen [Gysin-Maillart et al, 2016] -und dies unabhängig vom aktuellen Schweregrad suizidalen Erlebens und Verhaltens [Calati und Courtet, 2016 …”