2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3003794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Calculation Method to Design Parasitic Decoupling Technique for Two Antennas

Abstract: In this paper, a systematic and calculation-based parasitic decoupling technique (PDT) is proposed to mitigate the mutual coupling between two closely coupled antennas. The adopted parasitic decoupling structure consists of two transmission lines connected to the feed lines of antennas and a parasitic element connected with a transmission line and terminated by a reactive load. Rigorous decoupling theory and systematic design procedures are presented. The lengths of transmission lines and value of reactive loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method loaded with a single parasitic element [15] is very effective in dealing with equilateral triangular arrays, which can be extended to the isosceles triangular arrays where the mutual couplings between three elements are not much different (9 dB, 11.5 dB) [18]. When the vertex angle of the isosceles triangle has a more significant deviation from 60°, leading to a more considerable difference in mutual couplings, such as 5 dB in [19] and this paper, the method in [15] is not applicable. The method presented in this paper has no restrictions on the layout of the antenna, nor does it involve time-consuming EM optimizations.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The method loaded with a single parasitic element [15] is very effective in dealing with equilateral triangular arrays, which can be extended to the isosceles triangular arrays where the mutual couplings between three elements are not much different (9 dB, 11.5 dB) [18]. When the vertex angle of the isosceles triangle has a more significant deviation from 60°, leading to a more considerable difference in mutual couplings, such as 5 dB in [19] and this paper, the method in [15] is not applicable. The method presented in this paper has no restrictions on the layout of the antenna, nor does it involve time-consuming EM optimizations.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presented in this paper has no restrictions on the layout of the antenna, nor does it involve time-consuming EM optimizations. In addition, parasitic elements are reduced to one in this article compared with [19], and the decoupling effect achieved is first-class.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Traditional decoupling methods, such as neutralization line [3][4][5], parasitic element [6][7][8], EBG electromagnetic band gap [9][10][11], DGS defect ground structure [12][13][14][15] and decoupling network technology [16][17][18], all need to add additional decoupling structures in the middle of the antenna, which increases the complexity of the design. The occupied area of the antenna is large, and it cannot meet the compact requirements of the future 5G terminal antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%