2020
DOI: 10.18280/ijht.380116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Calculation Model for Liquid Carrying Capacity of Low-Yield Gas Wells

Abstract: In low-yield gas wells, liquid loading is a common problem due to energy loss and pressure drop along the wellbore, especially in the middle to late phases of development. Because liquid loading is inevitable, it is necessary to calculate how much liquid can be unloaded under the current yield. Inspired by dimensionless analysis, this paper explores the mechanism of liquid carryover at low gas-liquid ratios, analyzes the dynamics of gas-liquid two-phase flow, and then establishes a calculation model of liquid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao and Liu used 10 different models, including those proposed by Turner et al (1969), Coleman et al (2019), Li et al (2012), Belfroid, and the model modified by Zhao and Liu, to predict the wellbore liquid loading of three kinds of pipe diameters (2-3/8′, 2-7/8′, and 5-1/2′) in the FL shale gas field. By comparing the field liquid loading of gas wells, the accuracy of various critical liquid loading models for judging the liquid loading in gas wells with different pipe diameters was analyzed (Figure 8) (Zhao and Liu, 2019). The model modified by Zhao and Liu has the highest discrimination accuracy and the most accurate prediction, with an average accuracy of 90%.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Zhao and Liu used 10 different models, including those proposed by Turner et al (1969), Coleman et al (2019), Li et al (2012), Belfroid, and the model modified by Zhao and Liu, to predict the wellbore liquid loading of three kinds of pipe diameters (2-3/8′, 2-7/8′, and 5-1/2′) in the FL shale gas field. By comparing the field liquid loading of gas wells, the accuracy of various critical liquid loading models for judging the liquid loading in gas wells with different pipe diameters was analyzed (Figure 8) (Zhao and Liu, 2019). The model modified by Zhao and Liu has the highest discrimination accuracy and the most accurate prediction, with an average accuracy of 90%.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the casing production period of the well were substituted into the new critical liquid loading model established to analyze the liquid loading situation of the well. The critical liquid loading flow curve is shown in Figure 9 (Zhao and Liu, 2019).…”
Section: Casing Production Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yonghui Liu et al 73 conducted a visualization simulation experimental device for horizontal wells, using high‐definition cameras to capture the reversal of liquid‐film as the start of liquid accumulation, and developed a gas critical liquid‐carrying flow rate model at various angles, tubing inner diameter and liquid apparent flow rate. Zhejun Zhao et al 74 conducted experimental research on the actual production status of low‐pressure and low‐production wells based on the principle of similarity, indicting that low‐pressure and low‐production gas wells actually have a mixed state of upper mist flow and lower slug flow. The upper mist flow liquid‐carrying meet the calculation results of droplet model, while the lower slug flow is judged based on the gas phase velocity.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Current Situation Of Gas Critical Liquid Car...mentioning
confidence: 99%