2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel composite material based on hydroxylated g-C3N4 and oxygen-vacant TiO2 for improvement of photocatalytic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the CB of Cs 4 PW 11 Fe (2.81 eV vs. NHE) was more positive than E 0 (˙OH/OH − ) (2.38 eV vs. NHE), implying that h VB + of Cs 4 PW 11 Fe could oxidize OH − to yield ˙OH. 64 Thus, the results proved that ˙OH, ˙O 2 − and 1 O 2 were the main active species in the composite, while h + was an important player in the photocatalytic process, and the obtained above results were consistent with the ESR spin trapping assay and radical trapping assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the CB of Cs 4 PW 11 Fe (2.81 eV vs. NHE) was more positive than E 0 (˙OH/OH − ) (2.38 eV vs. NHE), implying that h VB + of Cs 4 PW 11 Fe could oxidize OH − to yield ˙OH. 64 Thus, the results proved that ˙OH, ˙O 2 − and 1 O 2 were the main active species in the composite, while h + was an important player in the photocatalytic process, and the obtained above results were consistent with the ESR spin trapping assay and radical trapping assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Drastically increased ESR signals at g = 2.003 were detected in pure TiO 2 and 40%-TiO 2 /CdS, which demonstrated the Ov was generated in both catalysts. 32,33 Most importantly, similar to the Ov XPS signal variation trend, the Ov EPR signal strength of 40%-TiO 2 /CdS was lower than that of TiO 2 , which implied the partial occupation of Ov by S atoms during Ti-S bond formation.…”
Section: Photocatalyst Design and Structural Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, the bandgap energy of the sample was calculated using the Tauc eqn (3) based on the UV-absorption spectrum in conjunction with the literature. 46 (ahn…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the bandgap energy of the sample was calculated using the Tauc eqn (3) based on the UV-absorption spectrum in conjunction with the literature. 46 ( αhν ) n = K ( hν − E g )where α is the absorption coefficient, hν is the energy of the incident photon, K is an energy-independent constant, E g is the optical bandgap energy of the semiconductor, and n = 1/2 and 2 represent the indirect leap of the direct leap of the semiconductor, respectively. The graph is plotted with ( ahν ) 1/2 as the vertical coordinate and hν as the horizontal coordinate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%