2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel computational framework for simultaneous integration of multiple types of genomic data to identify microRNA-gene regulatory modules

Abstract: Motivation: It is well known that microRNAs (miRNAs) and genes work cooperatively to form the key part of gene regulatory networks. However, the specific functional roles of most miRNAs and their combinatorial effects in cellular processes are still unclear. The availability of multiple types of functional genomic data provides unprecedented opportunities to study the miRNA–gene regulation. A major challenge is how to integrate the diverse genomic data to identify the regulatory modules of miRNAs and genes.Res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
212
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another joint variable and rank selection method (29) uses l 2 group penalty on the rows of C. However, this algorithm along with another recently proposed method (30) can reduce dimension in predictor space but not response space and does not provide information on independent regulatory programs. A sparse network-regularized multiple nonnegative matrix factorization (SNMNMF), which incorporates the known interaction from literature as a prior information in the parameter estimations, was recently proposed for the inference of miRNA-gene regulation (31). However, SNMNMF identifies only the coexistence relationship between predictors and responses without the estimation of the relative strength or direction of regulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another joint variable and rank selection method (29) uses l 2 group penalty on the rows of C. However, this algorithm along with another recently proposed method (30) can reduce dimension in predictor space but not response space and does not provide information on independent regulatory programs. A sparse network-regularized multiple nonnegative matrix factorization (SNMNMF), which incorporates the known interaction from literature as a prior information in the parameter estimations, was recently proposed for the inference of miRNA-gene regulation (31). However, SNMNMF identifies only the coexistence relationship between predictors and responses without the estimation of the relative strength or direction of regulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here k · k F is the Frobenius norm. Conditional on U, our estimation procedure with a hardthresholding function is equivalent to an l 0 penalization (31), and hence without the orthogonal constraints, the number of nonzero entries in the final estimate ofV v can be easily shown to be an unbiased estimator of the degrees of freedom of the l 0 penalization. Therefore, we estimate df v by d df v = #ðV!…”
Section: T-svd Model With the Svd Representation Of The Coefficient mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of MBCFM and fairly compare it with the other two existing methods of Mirsynergy and SNMNMF in miRNA regulatory modules detection, we apply these three methods to the ovarian cancer dataset processed by Zhang et al [10]. The miRNA and mRNA expression profiles for 385 samples were downloaded from TCGA data portal (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/), each measuring 559 miRNAs and 12456 mRNAs, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the mRNAs in R-pair structure have more functional consistency than the mRNAs that are not. In fact, there are several studies showing that miRNA tends to target highly connected mRNAs or proteins in PPI networks, and that the R-pair structure plays important roles in cell function [9][10][11]13]. So, the R-pair structure can be regarded as the core of a CMFM.…”
Section: Definition 1 R-pairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation