2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 2: Comparative anthropometric analysis of patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and healthy individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the findings of the present study, the nasolabial angle decreased in the Class III and UCLP patients as compared to the Class I control group. This was consistent with the findings of other studies in the literature [62,63]. However, the nasolabial angle increased in the BCLP group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to the findings of the present study, the nasolabial angle decreased in the Class III and UCLP patients as compared to the Class I control group. This was consistent with the findings of other studies in the literature [62,63]. However, the nasolabial angle increased in the BCLP group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One study included patients of both UCL and UCLP groups, whereas 2 studies included patients of both UCLP and UCLA groups. The selected studies included Caucasian [8][9][10][11]14,16,17 and East Asian 1,12,13,15,18,19 populations. Considering the differences in ethnicities and the number of enrolled studies, we performed a subgroup analysis for the UCLP group according to the patients' ethnicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the number of studies, including UCL and UCLA groups, was limited, and the measurement indicators differed across studies, resulting in some estimates that could not be combined for the analysis. Third, some studies that adopted two-dimensional analysis, 2,16 although elaborately studied, could only yield proportional and angular relationships, rather than more intuitive linear values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 It is widely accepted that there is a link between subjectively evaluated attractiveness and objective symmetry analyzes, 1,10,11 and there are several studies on the facial asymmetries of CLP patients in the literature. 7,[12][13][14] These studies were conducted using various methods, such as direct anthropometric measurements, 3 postero-posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs, 15 two-dimensional photographs, 16 cone-beam computed tomographies, 17 and three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry images. [18][19][20] Posteroanterior radiographic analysis, which is frequently used to evaluate facial asymmetries, is an effective method by which to demonstrate skeletal asymmetry; however, the soft tissues that cover skeletal structures can compensate for the underlying skeletal anomaly, to either reflect it as is or as more severe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%