2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02900-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel construct of anhedonia revealed in a Chinese sample via the Revised Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales

Abstract: Background Anhedonia is a core clinical symptom of mental disorders. The Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS) and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) have been applied in clinical and non-clinical samples since 1980s. However, the construct of a unified RPAS&RSAS for comprehensive measurement of anhedonia has never been explored. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to examine the factor structure of the unified RPAS&RSAS among undergraduates and clinical patients. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to measuring consummatory anhedonia, the SASPAS questionnaire we used focuses on anticipatory anhedonia, implicating a reduced motivation to engage in social or physical interaction. 55 Still, to further characterize not only the associations between anhedonia and apathy but also their differences, replication of our findings using other anhedonia measurement tools and (more importantly) apathy-specific questionnaires is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In addition to measuring consummatory anhedonia, the SASPAS questionnaire we used focuses on anticipatory anhedonia, implicating a reduced motivation to engage in social or physical interaction. 55 Still, to further characterize not only the associations between anhedonia and apathy but also their differences, replication of our findings using other anhedonia measurement tools and (more importantly) apathy-specific questionnaires is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%