2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel coupled framework for detecting hotspots of methane emission from the vulnerable Indian Sundarban mangrove ecosystem using data-driven models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other than freshwater sites, methane emission (0.02-0.5 mmol m −2 day −1 ) as mentioned by Abril and Borges [20] 0.02-0.5 mmol m −2 day −1 and was comparable to the value reported from the Avicennia mangrove site, Can Gio Mangrove Forest, Hochiminh City, Vietnam [3]. The Xuan Thuy methane emission rate in this study was higher than the values reported from Ranong Biosphere Reserve, Thailand [21], Red Sea, Saudi Arabia [22], Rhizophora mangrove site at Can Gio Mangrove Forest, Hochiminh City, Vietnam [23], but lower than those reported values from the Fitzroy River, Johnstone River, and Burdekin River mangrove creeks, Australia [24]; mangrove forest in Ouemo, New Caledonia [25]; Sundarban mangrove ecosystem, state of West Bengal, India [26], and Dongzhaigang National Nature Reserve, China [27] about 2, 6, 9-20, 12 and 27 fold, respectively (Table 4).…”
Section: Ch 4 Emission Comparison With Othercontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other than freshwater sites, methane emission (0.02-0.5 mmol m −2 day −1 ) as mentioned by Abril and Borges [20] 0.02-0.5 mmol m −2 day −1 and was comparable to the value reported from the Avicennia mangrove site, Can Gio Mangrove Forest, Hochiminh City, Vietnam [3]. The Xuan Thuy methane emission rate in this study was higher than the values reported from Ranong Biosphere Reserve, Thailand [21], Red Sea, Saudi Arabia [22], Rhizophora mangrove site at Can Gio Mangrove Forest, Hochiminh City, Vietnam [23], but lower than those reported values from the Fitzroy River, Johnstone River, and Burdekin River mangrove creeks, Australia [24]; mangrove forest in Ouemo, New Caledonia [25]; Sundarban mangrove ecosystem, state of West Bengal, India [26], and Dongzhaigang National Nature Reserve, China [27] about 2, 6, 9-20, 12 and 27 fold, respectively (Table 4).…”
Section: Ch 4 Emission Comparison With Othercontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Land use/ land cover changes are also the driving force of CH 4 generation. The research of Das et al [26] revealed that the highest CH 4 generation area was the mangrovedeforested agricultural lands, while the lowest produced region was the coastal mangrove forested region. This agrees with Zheng et al [35], who reported that, on average, undisturbed mangrove sites have very low CH 4 efflux rates.…”
Section: Relations Between Ch 4 Fluxes and Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%