2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.2251338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Track-Before-Detect in Radar Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the following simulated measurement data to test the performance of the proposed algorithm, which is widely used in the current study and some representative PF-TBD algorithms [2][3][4][5][6]. Meanwhile, the CV (constant velocity) and CT (coordinate turn) motion models are used for testing.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the following simulated measurement data to test the performance of the proposed algorithm, which is widely used in the current study and some representative PF-TBD algorithms [2][3][4][5][6]. Meanwhile, the CV (constant velocity) and CT (coordinate turn) motion models are used for testing.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of TBD algorithms have been developed in the past several decades including direct maximum likelihood [3], the Hough transform [4], dynamic programming [5,6], and so on. These methods generally require discretization of the state space and are very computationally intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to simultaneously estimate the object trajectory and select data samples for pulse integration accordingly. Trajectory estimation using the outputs of the matched filter tuned to the probing waveform is often referred to as track-before-detect (see, e.g., [3], [4]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing integration time is an effective way to improve the detection performance of weak targets. It is well-known that long-time integration methods can be categorised into three kinds: incoherent integration [2][3][4][5][6][7], coherent integration [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and hybrid integration [22]. Without utilising the phase information of target's echo, the integration performance of incoherent integration is the worst but the realisation of algorithm is simple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%