2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-017-2022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel electro-chlorinator using low cost graphite electrode for drinking water disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphite, which is inexpensive and available in large quantity, could offer a cost-conscious alternative for irrigation water disinfection at large scale. It was reported that active chlorine up to 0.75 mg/L can be generated at graphite anodes from an available chloride concentration of 8.5 mg/L in tap water (Saha & Gupta, 2017). The graphite anode corroded at a rate of 0.005 mm/hr, and thus, it was considered as a consumable during operation (Saha & Gupta, 2017).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Graphite, which is inexpensive and available in large quantity, could offer a cost-conscious alternative for irrigation water disinfection at large scale. It was reported that active chlorine up to 0.75 mg/L can be generated at graphite anodes from an available chloride concentration of 8.5 mg/L in tap water (Saha & Gupta, 2017). The graphite anode corroded at a rate of 0.005 mm/hr, and thus, it was considered as a consumable during operation (Saha & Gupta, 2017).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term tests lasting for months were not performed in this work. Therefore, we make a comparison between the lifetime of graphite and RuO 2 -IrO 2 /Ti anodes using the data from the works of Saha and Gupta (2017) and Kraft (2008). Saha and Gupta (2017) reported a corrosion rate of 0.005 mm/hr for graphite anodes after testing for three months at a current density of 1.5 mA/cm 2 in tap water containing 8.5 mg/L of chloride.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Lifetime Of The Graphite Anode And Power/ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, in terms of drinking water desinfection, electrochlorination is the most established method. Saha et al used low‐cost graphite electrodes in their study . Their batch reactor in bench scale consists of six units of graphite anodes and stainless steel cathodes and comprises an electrolyte volume of 3 L. Among the several investigated parameters, an active chlorine concentration of 2.5 mg L −1 and a current density of 1.5 mA cm −2 were found to be optimal.…”
Section: Removal Of Microorganisms By Electrochemical Disinfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high inter-electrode spacing seemed to negatively impact the efficiency of an electrochlorination system, and an optimum spacing of 0.5 cm was suggested by Khelifa et al [20]. Validation of the process of electrochlorination as one of the emerging and efficient methods of disinfecting drinking water was previously shown by many researchers [21,[23][24][25]. In fact, a few researchers also demonstrated that electrochemical remediation of bacterial population is highly effective even for the treatment of wastewater [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%