2016
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2016.1255667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel ensemble classifier of rotation forest and Naïve Bayer for landslide susceptibility assessment at the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam) using GIS

Abstract: (2017) A novel ensemble classifier of rotation forest and Naïve Bayer for landslide susceptibility assessment at the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam) using GIS, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8:2, 649-671, DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2016 ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to attempt a new soft computing approach for assessment of landslide susceptibility in the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai province (Viet Nam) using a novel classifier ensemble model of Na€ ıve Bayes and Rotation Forest. First,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods such as IG [17], chi-square statistics [30], and Relief-F [29] have been proposed for feature selection in landslide modeling. In this study, the IG, proposed by Quinlan (1993) [40], was used to determine irrelevant and unimportant variables.…”
Section: Information Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various methods such as IG [17], chi-square statistics [30], and Relief-F [29] have been proposed for feature selection in landslide modeling. In this study, the IG, proposed by Quinlan (1993) [40], was used to determine irrelevant and unimportant variables.…”
Section: Information Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the machine learning methods, artificial neural network [19,20], fuzzy logic [21,22], neuro-fuzzy [23], support vector machine [24,25], random forest [26,27], and naïve Bayes tree [17,28] methods have been popularly applied.More recently, ensemble machine learning techniques have been used to enhance the prediction power and robustness of landslide susceptibility assessment. The ensemble methods, formed by a combination of variously based classifiers, have typically demonstrated significant improvement [17,24,29,30]. Ensemble techniques, which are relatively new approaches for producing a landslide susceptibility map, have been rarely used in the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These systems can be established through combinations of two or more methods and techniques [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] or ensemble frameworks such as Stacking, Bagging, AdaBoost, Random Subspace, MultiBoost, Random Forests, Diverse DECORATE (Ensemble Creation by Oppositional Relabeling of Artificial Training Examples), and Rotation Forest [43,44]. Although these ensemble-based systems often improve performances of base classifiers, the Rotation Forest outperforms the others in term of accuracy and diversity in various datasets [43,45]. In addition, exploration of the Rotation Forest for landslide analysis has seldom been carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies among the results from different modeling approaches may be due to differences in model assumptions and algorithms. These common situations led to suggest using an ensemble of models for landslide susceptibility modeling, rather than relying on outputs from a single model to guide eradication efforts [31]. A random forest (RF) classification was adopted to combine the models and produce an ensemble landslide susceptibility map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%