2020
DOI: 10.1002/int.22256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel entropy proposition for spherical fuzzy sets and its application in multiple attribute decision‐making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A spherical aggregation operator and spherical fuzzy sets have been used in multi-attribute group decision making. 42,43 Although the works of entropy and cross-entropy theory in the fuzzy system especially on hesitant fuzzy and Pythagorean approach may also be noted over here. 44,45 Liang et al 46 used the linear assignment method for multicriteria group decision making to focus the usefulness of Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A spherical aggregation operator and spherical fuzzy sets have been used in multi-attribute group decision making. 42,43 Although the works of entropy and cross-entropy theory in the fuzzy system especially on hesitant fuzzy and Pythagorean approach may also be noted over here. 44,45 Liang et al 46 used the linear assignment method for multicriteria group decision making to focus the usefulness of Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Gül et al 41 invented a novel operator‐based cumulative belief degree to quantify credit rating. A spherical aggregation operator and spherical fuzzy sets have been used in multi‐attribute group decision making 42,43 . Although the works of entropy and cross‐entropy theory in the fuzzy system especially on hesitant fuzzy and Pythagorean approach may also be noted over here 44,45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these ranking results are quite different, and some are almost consistent. In order to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method, in this section, a comparison analysis with respect to the traditional RPN, the intuitionistic fuzzy-linear programming model-multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (IF-LPM-MABAC) method which calculates weights of risk factors with LPM, and ranks failure modes with MABAC method (Liu et al, 2019c), the spherical fuzzy-WASPAS (SF-WASPAS) method (Aydogdu & Gul, 2020) which calculates weights of risk factors with entropy measure, and ranks failure modes with MABAC method and the proposed FMEA method is conducted. Based on the above case, the ranking results of these four methods are shown in Table 7.…”
Section: Comparison Analysis Of Different Ranking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, a comparative analysis with the Pythagorean fuzzy MOORA method, 17 the picture fuzzy additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method, 53 the three‐dimensional fuzzy TOPSIS method, and the spherical fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method 54 is conducted to show the effectiveness of our proposed OHS risk assessment model. Figure 1 displays the risk ranking orders of the 11 occupational hazards derived by the considered methods.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%