2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000701)40:1<135::aid-prot150>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins

Abstract: We present a fast ab initio method for the prediction of local conformations in proteins. The program, PETRA, selects polypeptide fragments from a computer-generated database (APD) encoding all possible peptide fragments up to twelve amino acids long. Each fragment is defined by a representative set of eight straight phi/psi pairs, obtained iteratively from a trial set by calculating how fragments generated from them represent the protein databank (PDB). Ninety-six percent (96%) of length five fragments in cry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…discrete states, with as few as four to as many as 55 states. 18,20,45,46 In light of the strong correlation between the size of a state set and its ability to accurately represent native protein structures, 46 we use residue-specific, propensity-weighted state sets with as many as 72 2 states per residue. The state sets are derived from the Top500 database of protein structures, after eliminating residues where any main-chain atom has B-factor Ͼ 30.0 Å , 2 van der Waals overlap Ͼ 0.4 Å , 44 or grossly incorrect geometry.…”
Section: Fine-grained Residue-specific / State Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discrete states, with as few as four to as many as 55 states. 18,20,45,46 In light of the strong correlation between the size of a state set and its ability to accurately represent native protein structures, 46 we use residue-specific, propensity-weighted state sets with as many as 72 2 states per residue. The state sets are derived from the Top500 database of protein structures, after eliminating residues where any main-chain atom has B-factor Ͼ 30.0 Å , 2 van der Waals overlap Ͼ 0.4 Å , 44 or grossly incorrect geometry.…”
Section: Fine-grained Residue-specific / State Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topology of the conformational space seems to be a Klein bottle, but futher analysis is required to confirm this point [39]. The minimum root mean square error (RMSE) of the charts centers with respect to the crystal structure in the PDB considering all the atoms in the loop, including side chains, is about 0.2Å, which is comparable to the error obtained with other methods [23,17]. The conformation in the atlas giving the minimum RMSE is the one with minimum energy all over the conformational space at the given resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Finally, we consider the loop formed by the residues 120 to 124 of the dihydrofolate reductase of the lactobacillus casei (PDB code 3DFR). This loop that has been analyzed before [23,17], is used here to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed techniques to problems with conformational spaces of higher dimensionality. In all cases, the initial point to start the analysis is obtained with a Jacobian pseudo-inverse numerical inverse kinematics process [59].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the loops has received extensive specific attention, and several algorithms have been developed (Sudarsanam et al 1995;van Vlijmen and Karplus 1997;Wojcik et al 1999;Fiser et al 2000;DePristo et al 2003;Deane and Blundell 2000). There have also been several attempts to classify loop structures (Leszczynski and Rose 1986;Ring et al 1992;Efimov 1993).…”
Section: Protein Structure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%