2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/acpr.2015.7486498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel feature reduction framework for digital mammogram image classification

Abstract: The visual similarity between normal breast tissues and abnormal lesions in digital mammogram images makes computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer using automatically detected features a highly error-prone task. Our contribution in this paper is a novel feature reduction framework for selecting the most discriminative features that achieves both efficiency and classification accuracy. Our approach applies five individual feature-ranking methods including Fisher score, minimum redundancymaximum relevance, rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d. The performance of these methods is evaluated by confusion matrix parameters and misclassification rate. e. The results show that CLAHE+AGLCM with XGBoost is superior to previous works done by other authors [12] [13] [16]. The proposed methodology provides better mammogram classification using CLAHE+AGLCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…d. The performance of these methods is evaluated by confusion matrix parameters and misclassification rate. e. The results show that CLAHE+AGLCM with XGBoost is superior to previous works done by other authors [12] [13] [16]. The proposed methodology provides better mammogram classification using CLAHE+AGLCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Reference number Methodology Accuracy (%) [12] GLCM 94.2 [13] Gabor features 93.9 [16] CLAHE+HOG 66 [19] Spiculation index, fractional concavity and compactness 80%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation