“…The value of K T1 in Table 3 is quite different with the values from the superalloy tests in Table 2 and the analogous values of UHTCs in the work of Xie et al 39 In this case, the parameter Relative variation with increasing temperature K T1 contains the effects of both the temperature changes on the CCGs itself and the strain provided by the thermal expansion of the structure, so its value should be larger than the temperature sensitivity coefficient of the bare fibers, which is 7.780 × 10 −6 as reported in the work of Du et al [50] For a silica-based pristine fiber, the parameter K T1 is theoretically equal to the sum of the thermal expansion coefficient α and the thermo-optic coefficient ζ, and it varies in a range between 7 × 10 −6 and 11 × 10 −6°C−1 . [37,[55][56][57] Since the value of K T1 in Table 3 is even lower than the minimum theoretical value, it can be inferred that the thermal strain of the C/C composite has a negative impact on the response wavelength of the CCGs. A major feature of C/C materials is the negative thermal expansion characteristic from room temperature to 400°C, 58,59 and even at 800°C.…”