2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219527.64180.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel “Four-Rod Technique” for Lumbo-Pelvic Reconstruction: Theory and Technical Considerations

Abstract: Longer follow-up is necessary, and biomechanical and finite element studies are needed to show long-term efficacy of this technique, however, early results indicate that such a construct is feasible. Furthermore, depending on the general medical condition of the patient, immediate postoperative weight bearing is possible and reasonable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are various solutions, most authors recommend spinopelvic reconstruction after total or high proximal sacrectomy because of instability associated with complete dissociation of the mobile spine with the pelvis [17,18,28,41,45,55]. However, other surgeons [11,34,46], including us, do not advocate reconstruction of the osseous defect after total sacrectomy because of the risk of major wound complications (especially deep wound infection) and considering the acceptable ambulatory status of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are various solutions, most authors recommend spinopelvic reconstruction after total or high proximal sacrectomy because of instability associated with complete dissociation of the mobile spine with the pelvis [17,18,28,41,45,55]. However, other surgeons [11,34,46], including us, do not advocate reconstruction of the osseous defect after total sacrectomy because of the risk of major wound complications (especially deep wound infection) and considering the acceptable ambulatory status of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other surgeons [11,34,46], including us, do not advocate reconstruction of the osseous defect after total sacrectomy because of the risk of major wound complications (especially deep wound infection) and considering the acceptable ambulatory status of patients. Usually, after total sacrectomy, the lumbar spine migrates inferiorly and remains between the ilia [17,18,45,55]. The muscles and scar between the pelvis and spine form a biologic sling eventually stabilizing the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomy of this region, poor quality bone and non-availability of stable anchoring sites frequently place enormous loads at this junction [9]. They include axial, translational and rotational loads, and bending moments [6,10]. The potential for survival of patients over several years demands long-term stability from the reconstruction [14].…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lumbo-pelvic reconstruction is a challenging problem despite the advances in tumour reconstructive surgery [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The anatomy of this region, poor quality bone and non-availability of stable anchoring sites frequently place enormous loads at this junction [9].…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the complexity and some shortcomings of this former type of fixation we ourselves described several pelvic fixations over the years: the modified Luque for Duchenne's neuromuscular scoliosis, the MW fixation for severe and rigid pelvic obliquity, the adult pelvic fixation and the four-rod techniques for sacrectomy and/or previously failed deformity surgery [2][3][4][5]. Numerous authors have also described other methods of pelvic fixation, the latest using S2 screws to achieve anchor in the sacrum and pelvis [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%